4.3 Article

Simplifying Access to the Lateral Sphenoid Recess: A Modification of the Transpterygoid Approach

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 798-801

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/19458924211003813

Keywords

endoscopic endonasal approach; skull base surgery; encephalocele; CSF leak; skull base reconstruction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The MTPA is a quicker and less invasive approach to the lateral sphenoid recess which preserves the PPF contents, simplifying access and minimizing postoperative morbidity.
Background Meningoencephaloceles originating in the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus can be difficult to access. Historically, the endoscopic transpterygoid approach was advocated, which carries additional morbidity given the dissection of the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) contents to provide a direct line approach to the defect. Given our increased facility with angled endoscopes and instrumentation, we now approach this region in a less invasive manner. Methods We describe the endoscopic modified transpterygoid approach (MTPA), a quicker approach to the lateral sphenoid recess which preserves the PPF contents through a single nostril corridor. Results In the MTPA, the face of the sphenoid and anterior junction of the pterygoid plates are removed, allowing for mobilization of the PPF contents with the periosteum intact. Angled instrumentation is then used to resect the meningoencephalocele and repair the skull base defect in the lateral recess. If increased exposure is needed, this can be gained by sacrificing the sphenopalatine artery and even the vidian nerve, although this is rarely required. Conclusions The MTPA obviates the need for PPF dissection and simplifies access to the lateral sphenoid recess while minimizing postoperative morbidity. This approach should be considered for accessing meningoencephaloceles and other benign lesions in this challenging location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available