4.7 Article

Estimation of non-additive genetic variance in human complex traits from a large sample of unrelated individuals

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 786-798

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1113400, 1173790]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT180100186, FL180100072]
  3. University of Queensland's Research Computing Centre (RCC)
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1173790] Funding Source: NHMRC
  5. Australian Research Council [FL180100072, FT180100186] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a method to calculate non-additive genetic variance for complex traits by analyzing unrelated individuals with genome-wide SNP data instead of traditional data on relatives. The results show that genetic variance for complex traits is predominantly additive, and large sample sizes are needed to estimate epistatic variance accurately.
Non-additive genetic variance for complex traits is traditionally estimated from data on relatives. It is notoriously difficult to estimate without bias in non-laboratory species, including humans, because of possible confounding with environmental covariance among relatives. In principle, non-additive variance attributable to common DNA variants can be estimated from a random sample of unrelated individuals with genome-wide SNP data. Here, we jointly estimate the proportion of variance explained by additive (h(SNP)(2)), dominance (delta(2)(SNP)) and additive-by-additive (n(SNP)(2)) genetic variance in a single analysis model. We first show by simulations that our model leads to unbiased estimates and provide a new theory to predict standard errors estimated using either least-squares or maximum likelihood. We then apply the model to 70 complex traits using 254,679 unrelated individuals from the UK Biobank and 1.1Mgenotyped and imputed SNPs. We found strong evidence for additive variance (average across traits h(SNP)(-2) = 0:208). In contrast, the average estimate of delta(-2)(SNP) across traits was 0.001, implying negligible dominance variance at causal variants tagged by common SNPs. The average epistatic variance n(SNP)(-2) across the traits was 0.055, not significantly different from zero because of the large sampling variance. Our results provide new evidence that genetic variance for complex traits is predominantly additive and that sample sizes of many millions of unrelated individuals are needed to estimate epistatic variance with sufficient precision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available