4.3 Article

Body adiposity index to analyze the percentage of fat in young men aged between 7 and 17 years

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23599

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
  2. Physical Activity and Health (AFISA)
  3. Child and Adolescent Maturation Research Group (GEPMAC)
  4. National Council for Scientific Development (CNPQ)
  5. Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop and validate an adjusted body adiposity index (BAI(ADJ)) for male children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years. The adjusted BAI showed high correlation with DXA, indicating its potential as a tool for estimating body fat percentage, and demonstrated significant levels of agreement and validity in comparison to DXA.
Background The body adiposity index (BAI), uses anthropometry to estimate percent body fat (%F). However, previous studies have shown that the BAI has limited accuracy for children and adolescents. Objective We propose to develop and validate an adjusted BAI for use in male children and adolescents from 7 to 17 years of age. Methods The sample consisted of 141 physically active male children and adolescents (age: 12.5 +/- 2.14). The %F was determined by X-ray dual energy absorptometry equipment (DXA) as the standard method and by BAI, using an equation that uses height and hip circumference. Arithmetic modeling was used to adjust the structure of the BAI mathematical model. Results The BAI arithmetic adjustment was successful, resulting in the mathematical model named in the present study of adjusted body adiposity index (BAI(ADJ)). BAI and BAI(ADJ) correlated with DXA (r <= .70, p < .001). Regression analyzes indicate that, BAI (CI 95% beta: [1.35; 1.90], p < .0001) and BAI(ADJ) (CI 95% beta: [1.40; 1.90], p < .0001) have the potential to estimate %F. BAI pointed out a difference in relation to DXA (p = .04). While there was no difference between BAI(ADJ) and DXA (p = .1). There was a proportion bias of 13.2% for BAI (p < .05), but not for BAI(ADJ) (p > .05). Conclusion The adjusted model of the body adiposity index proves to be an effective tool for the analysis of the fat percentage in young males. In addition, it demonstrated significant degrees of agreement and validity in relation to DXA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available