4.5 Article

Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock-Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation [2018_A102]
  2. German Heart Research Foundation [F/10/18]
  3. Leipzig Heart Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial aiming to investigate the efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized to either ECLS plus early revascularization or no-ECLS treatment arms, with 30-day mortality as the primary efficacy endpoint.
Background In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. Study Design The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. Conclusions The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available