4.7 Article

Plasma P-tau181 to Aβ42 ratio is associated with brain amyloid burden and hippocampal atrophy in an Asian cohort of Alzheimer's disease patients with concomitant cerebrovascular disease

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 1649-1662

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12332

Keywords

Alzheimer' s disease; amyloid beta; biomarkers; cerebrovascular disease; non‐ Alzheimer' s pathophysiology; phosphorylated tau; plasma

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/CSASI/007/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The P-tau181/A beta 42 ratio may be an effective means of identifying Alzheimer's disease in non-White patient cohorts and patients with concomitant cerebrovascular disease.
Introduction There is increasing evidence that phosphorylated tau (P-tau181) is a specific biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, but its potential utility in non-White patient cohorts and patients with concomitant cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) is unknown. Methods Single molecule array (Simoa) measurements of plasma P-tau181, total tau, amyloid beta (A beta)40 and A beta 42, as well as derived ratios were correlated with neuroimaging modalities indicating brain amyloid (A beta+), hippocampal atrophy, and CeVD in a Singapore-based cohort of non-cognitively impaired (NCI; n = 43), cognitively impaired no dementia (CIND; n = 91), AD (n = 44), and vascular dementia (VaD; n = 22) subjects. Results P-tau181/A beta 42 ratio showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for A beta+ (AUC = 0.889) and for discriminating between AD A beta+ and VaD A beta- subjects (AUC = 0.903). In addition, P-tau181/A beta 42 ratio was associated with hippocampal atrophy. None of the biomarkers was associated with CeVD. Discussion Plasma P-tau181/A beta 42 ratio may be a noninvasive means of identifying AD with elevated brain amyloid in populations with concomitant CeVD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available