4.2 Article

Accuracy of Consumer-marketed smartphone-paired alcohol breath testing devices: A laboratory validation study

Journal

ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 1091-1099

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.14597

Keywords

alcohol breath test; alcohol consumption; blood alcohol concentration; smartphone

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [R49 CE002474]
  2. National Institutes of Health [K23 HD090272001, UL1 TR001878]
  3. VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  4. Abramson Family Foundation Fund for Acute Care and Injury Prevention Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this laboratory study, researchers administered ethanol to participants and measured their blood and breath alcohol concentrations, finding that smartphone-paired alcohol testing devices varied significantly in accuracy, with some devices posing a risk of underestimating alcohol concentrations.
Background Although alcohol breath testing devices that pair with smartphones are promoted for the prevention of alcohol-impaired driving, their accuracy has not been established. Methods In a within-subjects laboratory study, we administered weight-based doses of ethanol to two groups of 10 healthy, moderate drinkers aiming to achieve a target peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.10%. We obtained a peak phlebotomy BAC and measured breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) with a police-grade device (Intoxilyzer 240) and two randomly ordered series of 3 consumer smartphone-paired devices (6 total devices) with measurements every 20 min until the BrAC reached <0.02% on the police device. Ten participants tested the first 3 devices, and the other 10 participants tested the other 3 devices. We measured mean paired differences in BrAC with 95% confidence intervals between the police-grade device and consumer devices. Results The enrolled sample (N = 20) included 11 females; 15 white, 3 Asian, and 2 Black participants; with a mean age of 27 and mean BMI of 24.6. Peak BACs ranged from 0.06-0.14%. All 7 devices underestimated BAC by >0.01%, though the BACtrack Mobile Pro and police-grade device were consistently more accurate than the Drinkmate and Evoc. Compared with the police-grade device measurements, the BACtrack Mobile Pro readings were consistently higher, the BACtrack Vio and Alcohoot measurements similar, and the Floome, Drinkmake, and Evoc consistently lower. The BACtrack Mobile Pro and Alcohoot were most sensitive in detecting BAC driving limit thresholds, while the Drinkmate and Evoc devices failed to detect BAC limit thresholds more than 50% of the time relative to the police-grade device. Conclusions The accuracy of smartphone-paired devices varied widely in this laboratory study of healthy participants. Although some devices are suitable for clinical and research purposes, others underestimated BAC, creating the potential to mislead intoxicated users into thinking that they are fit to drive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available