4.7 Review

Quantifying physical activity in aged residential care facilities: A structured review

Journal

AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101298

Keywords

Long term care; Physical activity; Cognitive impairment; Aged; Accelerometery

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Research Capacity funding
  2. Cure Parkinson's Trust
  3. Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy
  4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 341
  5. Newcastle University
  6. Health Research Council of NZ [18/181]
  7. University of Auckland
  8. Auckland University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review found that ARC residents participated in low volumes and intensities of PA across different care levels, with limited variation in patterns of PA. Findings were limited by lack of consistency in methodological approaches and PA outcomes. Recommendations include focusing on total volume or low-light intensity PA as interventional outcomes and considering most useful methodology and PA outcomes to quantify PA in ARC residents.
Background: Engaging aged residential care (ARC) residents with physical activity (PA) may be a useful strategy to decelerate dependence and disability. It is unclear what volume, intensity and patterns of PA ARC residents participate in. This review aims to synthesize the literature to quantify the volume, intensity and pattern of PA that ARC residents participate in across differing care levels (e.g. low, intermediate, high, mixed), and make recommendations for future research. Methods: 30 studies of 48,760 yielded were reviewed using systematic review strategies. Results: Questionnaires and technological tools were used to assess PA, with accelerometers employed in 70% of studies. Overall, studies reported low volumes and intensities of PA across all care levels, and suggested limited variation in patterns of PA (e.g. little day-to-day variation in total PA). There was limited inclusion of people with cognitive impairment, potentially causing representativeness bias. Findings were limited by lack of consistency in methodological approaches and PA outcomes. Discussion: Based on findings and limitations of current research, we recommend that total volume or low-light intensity PA are more useful interventional outcomes than higher-intensity PA. Researchers also need to consider which methodology and PA outcomes are most useful to quantify PA in ARC residents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available