4.7 Article

Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 1464-1472

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab072

Keywords

care homes; COVID-19; older people; point-of-care-testing; polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  2. British Lung Foundation
  3. NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative
  4. NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative
  5. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands
  6. NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Cooperative (MIC) at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
  7. NIHR ARC Yorkshire and Humber
  8. NIHR Community Healthcare MIC
  9. NIHR
  10. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  11. NIHR OxfordMedtech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative
  12. Oxford Martin School
  13. Asthma UK
  14. NIHR Oxford and Thames Valley Applied Research Collaborative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the POCKIT (TM) Central point of care PCR test has acceptable sensitivity and specificity, especially for symptomatic cases, in care homes. Recommendations were provided to mitigate the frequency of residual use errors. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT (TM) Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes.
Introduction: Reliable rapid testing for COVID-19 is needed in care homes to reduce the risk of outbreaks and enable timely care. This study aimed to examine the usability and test performance of a point of care polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (POCKIT (TM) Central) in care homes. Methods: POCKIT (TM) Central was evaluated in a purposeful sample of four UK care homes. Test agreement with laboratory real-time PCR and usability and used errors were assessed. Results: No significant usability-related hazards emerged, and the sources of error identified were found to be amendable with minor changes in training or test workflow. POCKIT (TM) Central has acceptable sensitivity and specificity based on RT-PCR as the reference standard, especially for symptomatic cases. Asymptomatic specimens showed 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9-99.6%) positive agreement and 98.7% negative agreement (95% CI: 96.2-99.7%), with overall prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932-0.999). Symptomatic specimens showed 100% (95% CI: 2.5-100%) positive agreement and 100% negative agreement (95% CI: 85.8-100%), with overall PABAK of 1. Recommendations are provided to mitigate the frequency of occurrence of the residual use errors observed. Integration pathways were discussed to identify opportunities and limitations of adopting POCKIT (TM) Central for screening and diagnostic testing purposes. Conclusions: Point-of-care PCR testing in care homes can be considered with appropriate preparatory steps and safeguards. Further diagnostic accuracy evaluations and in-service evaluation studies should be conducted, if the test is to be implemented more widely, to build greater certainty on this initial exploratory analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available