4.8 Article

Significantly Improving the Bioefficacy for Rheumatoid Arthritis with Supramolecular Nanoformulations

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 33, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202100098

Keywords

biomaterials; protein engineering; nanomedicine; rheumatoid arthritis; nanoformulations

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0908900, 2018YFA0902600]
  2. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-09]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877104, 21834007, 22020102003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanotherapeutic formulations utilizing genetically engineered IL1ra protein complexes exhibit ultralong-lasting bioefficacy, significantly improving drug regimen for rheumatoid arthritis and potentially enhancing patient compliance with therapy.
As a typical inflammatory disease with chronic pain syndromes, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) generally requires long-term treatment with frequent injection administration at 1-2 times per day, because common medications such as interleukin1 receptor antagonist (IL1ra) have poor bioavailability and very limited half-life residence. Here a novel strategy to fabricate nanotherapeutic formulations employing genetically engineered IL1ra protein complexes, yielding ultralong-lasting bioefficacy is developed rationally. Using rat models, it is shown that these nanotherapeutics significantly improved drug regimen to a single subcutaneous administration in a 14-day therapy, suggesting their extraordinary bioavailability and ultralong-acting pharmacokinetics. Specifically, the half-life and bioavailability of the nanoformulations are boosted to the level of 30 h and by 7 times, respectively, significantly greater than other systems. This new strategy thus holds great promise to potently improve patient compliance in RA therapy, and it can be adapted for other therapies that suffer similar drawbacks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available