4.7 Article

Ciliated protozoa community of a combined UASB-activated sludge system in southeastern Brazil

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 23804-23814

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7591-3

Keywords

Ciliates; Microfauna; Anaerobic-aerobic systems; Wastewater treatment plants

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2010/16222]
  2. CAPES (Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) [23038.008057/2010-13]
  3. FURB (Fundacao Universidade Regional de Blumenau) [05/2008]
  4. CNPq (National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development-Edital Universal) [14/2010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the abundance and taxonomic composition of ciliated protozoa in the activated sludge of a full-scale combined anaerobic-aerobic system operating in a tropical country and (2) to study the relationship between the effluent quality, the physicochemical variables, and the ciliates present in the operating system. The total ciliate fauna of the activated sludge of the Picarro Wastewater Treatment Plant (Picarro WWTP) was composed of 36 morphospecies belonging to 33 genera. These included 21 species observed in the activated sludge samples on the day of collection and 15 species found in cultures. The activated sludge of the Picarro WWTP contained a diversified ciliate community composed mainly of indicator organisms. The most frequently occurring morphospecies were Aspidisca cicada, Vorticella spp., Gastronauta aloisi, Acineria uncinata, and Epistylis plicatilis complex. These results showed that satisfactory operating conditions prevailed at the Picarro WWTP. In the combined UASB-activated sludge system, the presence of Aspidisca cicada suggests the occurrence of denitrification in the process while the presence of Acineria uncinata and G. alosi indicates the removal of carbonaceous organic matter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available