Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Assessing the Impact of EQ-5D Country-specific Value Sets on Cost-utility Outcomes
Johanna M. van Dongen et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2021)
Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population
Samer A. Kharroubi et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2020)
Developing a New Version of the SF-6D Health State Classification System From the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2
John E. Brazier et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2020)
A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population
Marcos Bosi Ferraz et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES (2019)
Advocating a Paradigm Shift in Health-State Valuations: The Estimation of Time-Preference Corrected QALY Tariffs
Marcel F. Jonker et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2018)
The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies
Felix Angst et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology
Lau Caspar Thygesen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
Richard Norman et al.
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2014)
Swespine: the Swedish spine register
Bjorn Stromqvist et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
US Valuation of the SF-6D
Benjamin M. Craig et al.
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2013)
The Discriminative Properties of the SF-6D Compared With the SF-36 and ODI
Leah Y. Carreon et al.
SPINE (2013)
LOWERING THE FLOOR' OF THE SF-6D SCORING ALGORITHM USING A LOTTERY EQUIVALENT METHOD
Jose Maria Abellan Perpinan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2012)
Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Latin America: A Promising and Developing Field
Federico Augustovski et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2011)
A Portuguese Value Set for the SF-6D
Lara N. Ferreira et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2010)
Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36
John E. Brazier et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population
Cindy L. K. Lam et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2008)
Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations
Franco Sassi
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING (2006)
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12
JE Brazier et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2004)
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
J Brazier et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2002)
Share Paper
