Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire
Anna Dencker et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2020)
Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study
Anna E. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2020)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials
Marten Alkmark et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2020)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
Judit K. J. Keulen et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
The Swedish Neonatal Quality Register - contents, completeness and validity
Mikael Norman et al.
ACTA PAEDIATRICA (2019)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
Ulla-Britt Wennerholm et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Women's experiences of postterm induction of labor: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Stina Lou et al.
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2019)
The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women's satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women
Maja Falk et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2019)
Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study
F. Dos Santos et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2018)
Post-partum duration of satisfaction with childbirth
Sahruh Turkmen et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (2018)
The Swedish Pregnancy Register - for quality of care improvement and research
Olof Stephansson et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2018)
Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study
C. Lindblad Wollmann et al.
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2017)
Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Shuchita Mundle et al.
LANCET (2017)
Being in limbo: Women's lived experiences of pregnancy at 41 weeks of gestation and beyond - A phenomenological study
Anna Wessberg et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2017)
Three doses of oral misoprostol versus an intra-cervical Foley catheter for 24 hours for pre-induction cervical ripening in post-dated pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial
D. Somirathne et al.
CEYLON MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
Heidi Kruit et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2016)
Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Mieke L. G. ten Eikelder et al.
LANCET (2016)
Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
Helen Elden et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2016)
A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term
Farnaz K. Aghideh et al.
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE (2014)
Women's experiences of induction of labour - Findings from a Swedish regional study
Ingegerd Hildingsson et al.
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY (2011)
Factors independently related to a negative birth experience in first-time mothers
Christina Larsson et al.
SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE (2011)
Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument
Anna Dencker et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2010)
A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction
M. Prager et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2008)
Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy
Runa Heimstad et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2007)
Identifying hazardous alcohol consumption during pregnancy: implementing a research-based model in real life
M Goransson et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2006)
Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores
O Gelisen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2005)
Share Paper
