Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Impact of different visualization devices on accuracy, efficiency, and dexterity in neurosurgery: a laboratory investigation
Amol Raheja et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2021)
Comparison of Operating Microscope and Exoscope in a Highly Challenging Experimental Setting
Ahmad Hafez et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2021)
Monitor-based exoscopic 3D4k neurosurgical interventions: a two-phase prospective-randomized clinical evaluation of a novel hybrid device
Anna L. Roethe et al.
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2020)
Introductions of technological innovations in neurosurgery
Mario Ammirati
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2020)
Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal
Giles Birchley et al.
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS (2020)
Multicenter Investigation of Channel-Based Subcortical Trans-Sulcal Exoscopic Resection of Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series
Joshua Bakhsheshian et al.
OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY (2019)
Preliminary Clinical Microneurosurgical Experience With the 4K3-Dimensional Microvideoscope (ORBEYE) System for Microneurological Surgery: Observation Study
Yasuo Murai et al.
OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY (2019)
Pros and cons of using ORBEYE™ for microneurosurgery
Satoshi Takahashi et al.
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY (2018)
IDEAL, the operating microscope, and the parachute
Paolo Cappabianca et al.
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2018)
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
Jonathan A. Cook et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Trials and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studies
RJ Lilford et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2000)
Share Paper
