4.6 Article

Forward dynamics analysis of origami-folded deployable spacecraft structures

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 549-561

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.03.022

Keywords

Origami space structures; Folded space structures; Free deployment; Deployment dynamics

Funding

  1. NASA, United States of America Space Technology Research Fellowship [80NSSC17K0136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a general simulation framework for generating the motion equations of any structure that complies with a set of pattern assumptions, with unique adaptations for the highly constrained nature of folding structures. The solution is computationally efficient and able to analyze multiple systems, but constraint violations remain a continuing challenge for folding structures with multiple closed-chains.
A fast dynamics model that captures the deployment dynamics of self-actuated, origami-inspired, folded planar spacecraft structures is desired for design and verification applications. In this paper, a general simulation framework for numerically generating the equations of motion of any structure that complies with a set of pattern assumptions is presented. The framework is built through application of the articulated body forward dynamics algorithm and the tree-augmented approach for closed-chain forward dynamics. These are multi-body dynamics approaches developed in the literature for complex robotic manipulator systems. Unique adaptations are required to address the highly constrained nature of a folding structure. This solution is desirable due to the computational efficiency of the base algorithms and the ability to analyze multiple systems without reformulation of the core dynamics algorithm. Baumgarte stabilization techniques are applied to address constraint violations, but are found to be a continuing challenge for folding structures with several closed-chains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available