4.8 Review

Antimicrobial Nano-Agents: The Copper Age

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 6008-6029

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c10756

Keywords

copper; nanoparticles; antimicrobials; wound healing; communicable diseases; virus; bacteria; biodistribution; antiviral; ADMET

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [19852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper-based nanoparticles have shown effective antimicrobial activity and potential contributions to infectious disease management, making them a promising therapeutic approach in the face of major health threats. Understanding the behaviors of CuNPs and their expected impact on disease treatment is crucial for further utilization of this technology.
The constant advent of major health threats such as antibacterial resistance or highly communicable viruses, together with a declining antimicrobial discovery, urgently requires the exploration of innovative therapeutic approaches. Nowadays, strategies based on metal nanoparticle technology have demonstrated interesting outcomes due to their intrinsic features. In this scenario, there is an emerging and growing interest in copper-based nanoparticles (CuNPs). Indeed, in their pure metallic form, as oxides, or in combination with sulfur, CuNPs have peculiar behaviors that result in effective antimicrobial activity associated with the stimulation of essential body functions. Here, we present a critical review on the state of the art regarding the in vitro and in vivo evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of CuNPs together with absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) assessments. Considering the potentiality of CuNPs in antimicrobial treatments, within this Review we encounter the need to summarize the behaviors of CuNPs and provide the expected perspectives on their contributions to infectious and communicable disease management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available