4.2 Article

Efficient One-pass Synthesis for Digital Microfluidic Biochips

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3446880

Keywords

Digital microfluidic biochip (DMFB); design automation; one-pass synthesis

Funding

  1. LIT Secure and Correct Systems Lab - State of Upper Austria
  2. BMK
  3. BMDW
  4. State of Upper Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital microfluidics biochips require complex design processes, but recent advancements in one-pass design aim to address design gaps and inefficiencies. This article presents an efficient one-pass solution that is runtime efficient and outperforms previous heuristic approaches. Experimental results validate the benefits of this approach for large-scale assays.
Digital microfluidics biochips are a promising emerging technology that provides fluidic experimental capabilities on a chip (i.e., following the lab-on-a-chip paradigm). However, the design of such biochips still constitutes a challenging task that is usually tackled by multiple individual design steps, such as binding, scheduling, placement, and routing. Performing these steps consecutively may lead to design gaps and infeasible results. To address these shortcomings, the concept of one-pass design for digital microfluidics biochips has recently been proposed-a holistic approach avoiding the design gaps by considering the whole synthesis process as large. But implementations of this concept available thus far suffer from either high computational effort or costly results. In this article, we present an efficient one-pass solution that is runtime efficient (i.e., rarely needing more than a second to successfully synthesize a design) while, at the same time, producing better results than previously published heuristic approaches. Experimental results confirm the benefits of the proposed solution and allow for realizing really large assays composed of thousands of operations in reasonable runtime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available