Field-of-View Restriction to Reduce VR Sickness Does Not Impede Spatial Learning in Women

Women are more likely to experience virtual reality (VR) sickness than men, which could pose a major challenge to the mass market success of VR. Because VR sickness often results from a visual-vestibular conflict, an effective strategy to mitigate conflict is to restrict the user's field-of-view (FOV) during locomotion. Sex differences in spatial cognition have been well researched, with several studies reporting that men exhibit better spatial navigation performance in desktop three-dimensional environments than women. However, additional research suggests that this sex difference can be mitigated by providing a larger FOV as this increases the availability of landmarks, which women tend to rely on more than men. Though FOV restriction is already a widely used strategy for VR headsets to minimize VR sickness, it is currently not well understood if it impedes spatial learning in women due to decreased availability of landmarks. Our study (n = 28, 14 men and 14 women) found that a dynamic FOV restrictor was equally effective in reducing VR sickness in both sexes, and no sex differences in VR sickness incidence were found. Our study did find a sex difference in spatial learning ability, but an FOV restrictor did not impede spatial learning in either sex.

Automated summary

Women are more likely to experience VR sickness than men, but restricting field-of-view can help mitigate this issue. Sex differences in spatial cognition exist, but providing a larger FOV can reduce this difference by increasing the availability of landmarks, which women rely on more. Our study found that a dynamic FOV restrictor is equally effective in reducing VR sickness in both sexes and does not impede spatial learning.