4.5 Article

The Removal of Selected Inorganics from Municipal Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Using UF/NF/RO Membranes for Water Reuse Application: A Pilot-Scale Study

Journal

MEMBRANES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11020117

Keywords

membrane bioreactor (MBR); secondary effluent; ultrafiltration (UF); inorganics; Nanofiltration (NF); reverse Osmosis (RO); chemical oxygen demand (COD); municipal wastewater treatment works (MWWTWs); flux; reuse

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF-RSA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membrane technology has advanced as a preferred choice for water reclamation, with MBR/RO combination showing excellent removal rates for selected inorganics (>90%) and meeting reuse standards. However, information on UF/NF/RO performance at a pilot scale is currently limited.
Membrane technology has advanced substantially as a preferred choice for the exclusion of widespread pollutants for reclaiming water from various treatment effluent. Currently, little information is available about Ultrafiltration (UF)/Nanofiltration (NF)/Reverse Osmosis (RO) performance at a pilot scale as a practical engineering application. In this study, the effluent from a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) municipal wastewater treatment works (MWWTWs) was treated with an RO pilot plant. The aim was to evaluate the effect of operating conditions in the removal of selected inorganics as a potential indirect water reuse application. The influent pH, flux, and membrane recovery were the operating conditions varied to measure its influence on the rejection rate. MBR/RO exhibited excellent removal rates (>90%) for all selected inorganics and met the standard requirements for reuse in cooling and irrigation system applications. The UF and NF reduction of inorganics was shown to be limited to meet water standards for some of the reuse applications due to the high Electron Conductivity (EC > 250 mu S center dot cm(-1)) levels. The MBR/NF was irrigation and cooling system compliant, while for the MBR/UF, only the cooling system was compliant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available