4.5 Article

Corticostriatal Plasticity Established by Initial Learning Persists after Behavioral Reversal

Journal

ENEURO
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0209-20.2021

Keywords

animal behavior; auditory-motor association; coticostriatal plasticity; reversal learning; stimulus-action association; synaptic plasticity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Charles A. Dana Fellowship, of The Dana Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study trained mice on an auditory-motor reversal task and found that synaptic changes associated with initial learning were maintained even when task contingencies were reversed. This suggests that learned synaptic changes are not erased, and behavioral reversal may recruit a separate neural circuit.
The neural mechanisms that allow animals to adapt their previously learned associations in response to changes in the environment remain poorly understood. To probe the synaptic mechanisms that mediate such adaptive behavior, we trained mice on an auditory-motor reversal task, and tracked changes in the strength of corticostriatal synapses associated with the formation of learned associations. Using a ChR2-based electrophysiological assay in acute striatal slices, we measured the strength of these synapses after animals learned to pair auditory stimuli with specific actions. Here, we report that the pattern of synaptic strength initially established by learning remains unchanged even when the task contingencies are reversed. Our findings reveal that synaptic changes associated with the initial acquisition of this task are not erased or overwritten, and that behavioral reversal of learned associations may recruit a separate neural circuit. These results suggest a more complex role of the striatum in regulating flexible behaviors where activity of striatal neurons may vary given the behavioral contexts of specific stimulus-action associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available