4.6 Article

On the application of surrogate regression models for aerodynamic coefficient prediction

Journal

COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 1991-2021

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-021-00307-y

Keywords

Machine learning; Aerodynamic analysis; Computational fluid dynamics; Surrogate modelling; Regression; Support vector machines for regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are widely used in aeronautical industries to analyze aerodynamic performance, with surrogate models being considered as a substitute for reducing time and cost. This paper reviews surrogate regression models for aerodynamic coefficient prediction and compares them using three different aeronautical configurations.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are nowadays been intensively used in aeronautical industries to analyse the aerodynamic performance of different aircraft configurations within a design process. These simulations allow to reduce time and cost compared to wind tunnel experiments or flight tests. However, for complex configurations, CFD simulations may still take several hours using high-performance computers to deliver results. For this reason, surrogate models are currently starting to be considered as a substitute of the CFD tool with a reasonable prediction. This paper presents a review on surrogate regression models for aerodynamic coefficient prediction, in particular for the prediction of lift and drag coefficients. To compare the behaviour of the regression models, three different aeronautical configurations have been used, a NACA0012 airfoil, a RAE2822 airfoil and 3D DPW wing. These databases are also freely provided to the scientific community to allow other researchers to make further comparison with other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available