4.7 Article

Is CO2 emission a side effect of financial development? An empirical analysis for China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages 21041-21057

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7315-8

Keywords

Financial development; Environmental quality; Provincial panel data; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71403015, 71521002]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [9162013]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry of China [20152132001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on panel data for 29 Chinese provinces from 1995 to 2012, this paper explores the relationship between financial development and environmental quality in China. A comprehensive framework is utilized to estimate both the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO2 emissions in China using a carefully designed two-stage regression model. The first-difference and orthogonal-deviation Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) methods are used to control for potential endogeneity and introduce dynamics. To ensure the robustness of the estimations, two indicators measuring financial development-financial depth and financial efficiency-are used. The empirical results indicate that the direct effects of financial depth and financial efficiency on environmental quality are positive and negative, respectively. The indirect effects of both indicators are U shaped and dominate the shape of the total effects. These findings suggest that the influences of the financial development on environment depend on the level of economic development. At the early stage of economic growth, financial development is environmentally friendly. When the economy is highly developed, a higher level of financial development is harmful to the environmental quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available