4.7 Article

Numerical analysis of heat transfer enhancement and flow characteristics inside cross-combined ellipsoidal dimple tubes

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100937

Keywords

Cross-combined dimple tube; Numerical simulation; Heat transfer enhancement; Flow characteristics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the heat transfer performance of the crosscombined dimple tube is significantly enhanced compared to the single ellipsoidal dimple tube, by changing temperature distribution and increasing the gradient in the core region. The concave surface profile can disrupt flow and enhance mixing of hot and cold fluids.
The heat transfer and flow characteristics have been numerically investigated in the crosscombined dimple tube with the k-epsilon model, and the enhancement model based on compositeshape surface technologies is established for the first time. The results indicate that the heat transfer index, friction factor and performance evaluation criteria increase tremendously by comparing with the single ellipsoidal dimple tube at considered operating conditions. In particular, the heat transfer enhancement rises by 18.8-48.3%, and an average of 24.8%, when compared with the traditional single ellipsoidal tube. 3D simulation is carried out to elaborate the influence mechanism of dimples on the thermal performance and concludes that dimples can further enhance heat transfer through changing temperature distribution and increasing the gradient of the core region at the dimple section. The concave surface profile can disturb steady flow and boundary layer development to enhance the mixture of hot fluid and cold fluid. Additionally, the effects of geometric parameters on thermal and hydraulic performances are discussed to reveal that the larger quantity and volume of dimples lead to a better comprehensive thermohydraulic performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available