4.7 Article

Cost-effectiveness of community health systems strengthening: quality improvement interventions at community level to realise maternal and child health gains in Kenya

Journal

BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002452

Keywords

health economics; maternal health; child health; health systems evaluation

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 FP7/2007-2011) [306090]
  2. American people through the US Agency for International Development (USAID)
  3. Public Health Intervention Development Scheme through the UKRI Medical Research Council [MR/T003324/1]
  4. [AID-OAA-A-16-00018]
  5. MRC [MR/T003324/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of using community-level quality improvement to reduce maternal and infant mortality in Kenya. Results showed that the quality improvement intervention was more cost-effective compared to standard community healthcare, with improvements in antenatal care uptake and skilled delivery. Quality improvement interventions may be a good investment and yield benefits in other health areas.
Introduction Improvements in maternal and infant health outcomes are policy priorities in Kenya. Achieving these outcomes depends on early identification of pregnancy and quality of primary healthcare. Quality improvement interventions have been shown to contribute to increases in identification, referral and follow-up of pregnant women by community health workers. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using quality improvement at community level to reduce maternal and infant mortality in Kenya. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of quality improvement compared with standard of care treatment for antenatal and delivering mothers using a decision tree model and taking a health system perspective. We used both process (antenatal initiation in first trimester and skilled delivery) and health outcomes (maternal and infant deaths averted, as well as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) as our effectiveness measures and actual implementation costs, discounting costs only. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results We found that the community quality improvement intervention was more cost-effective compared with standard community healthcare, with incremental cost per DALY averted of $249 under the deterministic analysis and 76% likelihood of cost-effectiveness under the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a standard threshold. The deterministic estimate of incremental cost per additional skilled delivery was US$10, per additional early antenatal care presentation US$155, per maternal death averted US$5654 and per infant death averted US$37 536 (2017 dollars). Conclusions This analysis shows that the community quality improvement intervention was cost-effective compared with the standard community healthcare in Kenya due to improvements in antenatal care uptake and skilled delivery. It is likely that quality improvement interventions are a good investment and may also yield benefits in other health areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available