4.7 Article

Intestinal Dysbiosis in Young Cystic Fibrosis Rabbits

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020132

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; rabbits; intestinal dysbiosis; feces microbiome

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL133162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified a new CF animal model that exhibits intestinal dysbiosis phenotype, which may facilitate research and development of novel treatments for CF-associated gastrointestinal diseases. The fecal microbiomes of CF rabbits showed lower richness and diversity compared to wild-type rabbits, indicating significant taxonomic and functional dysbiosis.
Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) often experience gastrointestinal (GI) abnormalities. In recent years, the intestinal microbiome has been postulated as a contributor to the development of CF-associated GI complications, hence representing a potential therapeutic target for treatment. We recently developed a rabbit model of CF, which is shown to manifest many human patient-like pathological changes, including intestinal obstruction. Here, we investigated the feces microbiome in young CF rabbits in the absence of antibiotics treatment. Stool samples were collected from seven- to nine-week-old CF rabbits (n = 7) and age-matched wild-type (WT) rabbits (n = 6). Microbiomes were investigated by iTag sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, and functional profiles were predicted using PICRUSt. Consistent with reports of those in pediatric CF patients, the fecal microbiomes of CF rabbits are of lower richness and diversity than that of WT rabbits, with a marked taxonomic and inferred functional dysbiosis. Our work identified a new CF animal model with the manifestation of intestinal dysbiosis phenotype. This model system may facilitate the research and development of novel treatments for CF-associated gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available