Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix after conservative mastectomy: can a more effective alternative be used in the near future?
Gianluca Franceschini et al.
EJSO (2021)
Nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with endoscopic immediate reconstruction via axillary incision for breast cancer: A preliminary experience of an innovative technique
Gianluca Franceschini et al.
BREAST JOURNAL (2020)
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Shayda J. Mirhaidari et al.
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY (2020)
PROMs in post-mastectomy care: Patient self-reports (BREAST-Q™) as a powerful instrument to personalize medical services
M. Ghilli et al.
EJSO (2020)
Evidence-based nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with higher body mass index: Recommendations for a successful standardized surgery
Gianluca Franceschini et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
Oscar J. Manrique et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2020)
Submuscular and Pre-pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review
Roberto Cuomo
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA (2020)
Do Nipple Necrosis Rates Differ in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
Sterling E. Braun et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2020)
Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysis
Lun Li et al.
EJSO (2019)
Cost-effectiveness of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A pilot comparative analysis
Emanuele Garreffa et al.
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY (2019)
Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
Laurentine S. E. van Egdom et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2019)
Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results
Roy de Vita et al.
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER (2019)
Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
Jun Young Yang et al.
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS (2019)
Automated Breast Ultrasonography (ABUS) in the Screening and Diagnostic Setting: Indications and Practical Use
Rossella Rella et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2018)
The Economics of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Scot Bradley Glasberg
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2017)
Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques
Maurice Y. Nahabedian et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2017)
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits
Michael Sorkin et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2017)
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Hani Sbitany et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2017)
Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider?
M. -K. Tasoulis et al.
EJSO (2017)
Direct to Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: Patient Selection by Preoperative Digital Mammogram
Alberto O. Rancati et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2017)
A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: A cohort study
Nicola R. Dean et al.
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY (2016)
Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction
Lin Zhu et al.
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY (2016)
Standardizing Patient Outcomes Measurement
Michael E. Porter et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Oxidized regenerated cellulose in breast surgery: experimental model
Gianluca Franceschini et al.
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH (2015)
Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up
Marco Bernini et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN (2015)
Contralateral Breast Symmetrisation in Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Unilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Tailored Reduction/Augmentation Mammaplasty
Marzia Salgarello et al.
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS (2015)
Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness
S. A. Robertson et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2014)
Economic Analysis and Review of the Literature on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without the Use of the Acellular Dermal Matrix
Jonathan Bank et al.
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY (2013)
Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Plastic Surgery
Natalia I. Ziolkowski et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2013)
A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrix to Autologous Dermal Flaps in Single-Stage, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Naveen M. Krishnan et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2013)
Update on one-stage immediate breast reconstruction with definitive prosthesis after sparing mastectomies
Marzia Salgarello et al.
BREAST (2011)
Measuring Quality of Life in Oncologic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Constance M. Chen et al.
BREAST JOURNAL (2010)
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction: Cosmetic Outcomes and Technical Refinements
Marzia Salgarello et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2010)
Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction - Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study
Dunya Atisha et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2008)
Share Paper
