4.7 Article

Cofeeding tolerance in chimpanzees depends on group composition: A longitudinal study across four communities

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102175

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
  2. University of Leipzig
  3. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [12W5318N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found considerable variation in social tolerance among groups and years, closely corresponding with changes in group-level demographic composition. For example, cofeeding tolerance is lower when there are many females with young infants. These results suggest that social tolerance in chimpanzees may be dynamic and responsive to changes in social dynamics. Further experimental research is needed to understand the causal drivers of social tolerance within and between species.
Social tolerance is generally treated as a stable, species-specific characteristic. Recent research, however, has questioned this position and emphasized the importance of intraspecific variation. We investigate the temporal stability of social tolerance in four groups of sanctuary-housed chimpanzees over eight years using a commonly employed measure: experimental cofeeding tolerance. We then draw on longitudinal data on the demographic composition of each group to identify the factors associated with cofeeding tolerance. We find appreciable levels of variation in cofeeding tolerance across both groups and years that correspond closely to changes in group-level demographic composition. For example, cofeeding tolerance is lower when there are many females with young infants. These results suggest that social tolerance may be a responding trait'' of chimpanzee sociality, reflecting individual-level behavioral responses to social changes. Additional, experimental research is needed to better model the causal drivers of social tolerance within and among species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available