4.7 Article

The role of Piezo1 in conventional aqueous humor outflow dynamics

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFA0109500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870653, 21807063, 81730027]
  3. Georgia Research Alliance
  4. Shan-dong Province Shandong Province National Science Foundation, China [ZR2017BH007]
  5. Shandong Key Research and Development Program, China [2019GSF107075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Piezo1 in the conventional aqueous humor outflow pathway plays a role in influencing intraocular pressure maintenance by activating mechanosensitive currents in trabecular meshwork cells. Interference with mechanosensitive channels can alter aqueous outflow facility and ocular compliance.
Controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) remains themainstay of glaucoma therapy. The trabecular meshwork (TM), the key tissue responsible for aqueous humor (AH) outflow and IOP maintenance, is very sensitive to mechanical forces. However, it is not understood whether Piezo channels, very sensitive mechanosensors, functionally influence AH outflow. Here, we characterize the role of Piezo1 in conventional AH outflow. Immunostaining and western blot analysis showed that Piezo1 is widely expressed by TM. Patch-clamp recordings in TM cells confirmed the activation of Piezo1-derived mechanosensitive currents. Importantly, the antagonist GsMTx4 for mechanosensitive channels significantly decreased steady-state facility, yet activation of Piezo1 by the specific agonist Yoda1 did not lead to a facility change. Furthermore, GsMTx4, but not Yoda1, caused a significant increase in ocular compliance, a measure of the eye's transient response to IOP perturbation. Our findings demonstrate a potential role for Piezo1 in conventional outflow, likely under pathological and rapid transient conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available