4.7 Article

Insights into aqueous carbofuran removal by modified and non-modified rice husk biochars

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 29, Pages 22755-22763

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7430-6

Keywords

Agricultural by-product; Dynamic adsorption; Pesticide; Pyrolysis; Activated carbon; Steamactivation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Technology, Research and Atomic Energy, Sri Lanka [MTR/TRD/AGR/3/1/8]
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochar has been considered as a potential sorbent for removal of frequently detected pesticides in water. In the present study, modified and non-modified rice husk biochars were used for aqueous carbofuran removal. Rice husk biochars were produced at 300, 500, and 700 degrees C in slow pyrolysis and further exposed to steam activation. Biochars were physicochemically characterized using proximate, ultimate, FTIR methods and used to examine equilibrium and dynamic adsorption of carbofuran. Increasing pyrolysis temperature led to a decrease of biochar yield and increase of porosity, surface area, and adsorption capacities which were further enhanced by steam activation. Carbofuran adsorption was pH-dependant, and the maximum (161 mg g(-1)) occurred in the vicinity of pH 5, on steam-activated biochar produced at 700 degrees C. Freundlich model best fitted the sorption equilibrium data. Both chemisorption and physisorption interactions on heterogeneous adsorbent surface may involve in carbofuran adsorption. Langmuir kinetics could be applied to describe carbofuran adsorption in a fixed bed. A higher carbofuran volume was treated in a column bed by a steam-activated biochar versus non-activated biochars. Overall, steam-activated rice husk biochar can be highlighted as a promising low-cost sustainable material for aqueous carbofuran removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available