4.7 Article

The ubiquitination-deubiquitination cycle on the ribosomal protein eS7A is crucial for efficient translation

Journal

ISCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102145

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H05500, JP18H04022, JP18KK0229, JP19H04966, JP20K06628, JP18H03977, JP19H05281, JP19K06481]
  2. AMED [19gm1110003 AMED-CREST]
  3. Joint Usage and Joint Research Programs, the Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ubiquitination and deubiquitination cycle of ribosomal proteins play a crucial role in efficient protein translation. Ubiquitination at lysine 83 of eS7 is important for translation efficiency, with Otu2 and Ubp3 identified as the deubiquitinating enzymes. Ubp3 inhibits polyubiquitination to maintain eS7 in a mono-ubiquitinated form, while Otu2 promotes mRNA dissociation from 40S ribosomes in the recycling step.
Ubiquitination is a major post-translational modification of ribosomal proteins. The role of ubiquitination in the regulation of ribosome functions is still being elucidated. However, the importance of ribosome deubiquitination remains unclear. Here, we show that the cycle of ubiquitination and deubiquitination of the 40S ribosome subunit eS7 is important for efficient translation. eS7 ubiquitination at lysine 83 is required for efficient protein translation. We identified Otu2 and Ubp3 as the deubiquitinating enzymes for eS7. An otu2 Delta ubp3 Delta mutation caused a defect in protein synthesis. Ubp3 inhibited polyubiquitination of eS7 in polysomes to keep eS7 in a mono-ubiquitinated form, whereas Otu2 was specifically bound to the free 40S ribosome and promoted the dissociation of mRNAs from 40S ribosomes in the recycling step. Our results provide clues for understanding the molecular mechanism of the translation system via a ubiquitination-deubiquitination cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available