4.6 Article

Evolutionary insights into coagulation factor IX Padua and other high-specific-activity variants

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 1324-1332

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000405

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Blood Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [1K08HL140078]
  3. NIH/NHLBI [P01HL64190, P01HL139420]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that the canine FIX variant R338L has higher activity compared to wild-type FIX, and the human FIX variant R338L is also the most active. Furthermore, there appears to be evolutionary pressure to limit FIX activity, resulting in lower activity of wild-type FIX.
The high-specific-activity factor IX (FIX) variant Padua (R338L) is the most promising transgene for hemophilia B (HB) gene therapy. Although R338 is strongly conserved in mammalian evolution, amino acid substitutions at this position are underrepresented in HB databases. We therefore undertook a complete 20 amino acid scan and determined the specific activity of human (h) and canine (c) FIX variants with every amino acid substituted at position 338. Notably, we observe that hFIX-R338L is the most active variant and cFIX-R338L is sevenfold higher than wild-type (WT) cFIX. This is consistent with the previous identification of hFIX-R338L as a cause of a rare X-linked thrombophilia risk factor. Moreover, WT hFIX and cFIX are some of the least active variants. We confirmed the increased specific activity relative to FIX-WT in vivo of a new variant, cFIX-R338I, after gene therapy in an HB dog. Last, we screened 232 pediatric subjects with thromboembolic disease without identifying F9 R338 variants. Together these observations suggest a surprising evolutionary pressure to limit FIX activity with WT FIX rather than maximize FIX activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available