4.3 Article

Distinct Side Population Cell Subtypes Have Different Stemness Levels in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 127-132

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-021-2327-0

Keywords

ovarian cancer; cancer stem cells; heterogeneity; side population

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST) [2017KFYXJJ122]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672580]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that different subtypes of ovarian cancer SP cells have varying levels of stemness, with the LSP cell subtype exhibiting higher stem cell marker expression, greater in vitro sphere-forming capability, increased cisplatin resistance, and enhanced in vivo tumorigenicity compared to USP cells. NSP cells showed no stemness characteristics.
The stemness of different side population (SP) cell subtypes in ovarian cancer cells was studied, and the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer stem cells was analyzed. The cisplatin-resistant human serous ovarian cancer cell line C13 was stained with the bisbenzimide Hoechst 33342. A flow cytometry-based fluorescence-activated sorting method was used to obtain lower-SP (LSP) cells, upper-SP (USP) cells, and non-SP cells (NSP) based on their sensitivity to the staining time and Hoechst dye concentration. The sphere-forming capability, expression levels of stem cell markers, resistance to high concentrations of cisplatin, and subcutaneous tumorigenicity in NOD/SCID mice of the different cell subtypes were evaluated. The C13 cells contained SP cells with stemness characteristics, and the LSP cell subtype expressed higher levels of stem cell markers, had higher in vitro sphere-forming capability, higher cisplatin resistance and higher in vivo subcutaneous tumorigenesis than USP cells (P<0.05). NSP cells had no stemness. In conclusion, different subtypes of ovarian cancer SP cells have different stemness levels, and ovarian cancer stem cells may be heterogeneous.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available