4.2 Article

Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine during Covid-19: analysis of patient-reported outcomes

Journal

BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 261-268

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200954

Keywords

abortion; induced; patient reported outcome measures; abortion; therapeutic; mifepristone; surveys and questionnaires; patient satisfaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients had high confidence in telemedicine EMA and were satisfied with the convenience, privacy, and ease of managing abortion at home. The sample surveyed was representative of the whole population receiving telemedicine, with the majority of patients preferring the telemedicine pathway and indicating they would choose it again if COVID-19 was no longer a factor. This evidence supports the case for making telemedicine EMA a permanent option.
Introduction The English government approved both stages of early medical abortion (EMA), using mifepristone and misoprostol under 10 weeks' gestation, for at-home use on 30 March 2020. MSI Reproductive Choices UK (MSUK), one of the largest providers of abortion services in England, launched a no-test telemedicine EMA pathway on 6 April 2020. The objectives of this study were to report key patient-reported outcome measures and to assess whether our sample was representative of the whole population receiving no-test telemedicine EMA. Methods A sample of all MSUK's telemedicine EMA patients between April and August 2020 were invited to opt in to a follow-up call to answer clinical and satisfaction questions. A total of 1243 (13.7% of all telemedicine EMAs) were successfully followed-up, on average within 5 days post-procedure. Results Patients reported high confidence in telemedicine EMA and high satisfaction with the convenience, privacy and ease of managing their abortion at home. The sample responding were broadly equivalent to the whole population receiving telemedicine. No patient reported that they were unable to consult privately. The majority (1035, 83%) of patients reported preferring the telemedicine pathway, with 824 (66%) indicating that they would choose telemedicine again if COVID-19 were no longer an issue. Conclusions Telemedicine EMA is a valued, private, convenient and more accessible option that is highly acceptable for patients seeking an abortion, especially those for whom in-clinic visits are logistically or emotionally challenging. Evidence that this pathway would be a first choice again in future for most patients supports the case to make telemedicine EMA permanent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available