4.3 Article

Allophoma species (Pleosporales: Didymellaceae) associated with Thunbergia grandiflora in Guangxi Province, China

Journal

BIODIVERSITY DATA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e63643

Keywords

one new species; Didymellaceae; phylogeny; taxonomy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972222, 31660011, 31950410558]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program) [D20023]
  3. Talent Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Platform [[2017]5788-5, [2019]5641, [2019]13]
  4. Guizhou Science, Technology Department of International Cooperation Base Project [[2018]5806]
  5. Project of Guizhou Provincial Education Department [[2020]001]
  6. Guizhou Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team Project [[2020]5001]
  7. Guizhou Medical University [FAMP201906K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new species of Allophoma, named A. thunbergiae, was discovered from the leaves of Thunbergia grandiflora in China, showing close affinity to A. minor. This marks the first report of Allophoma taxa from this specific host plant.
Background Thunbergia grandiflora belongs to the family Acanthaceae and is a widely distributed dicotyledonous plant in tropical and subtropical regions. Three isolates of Allophoma (Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Didymellaceae) were collected from leaves of T. grandiflora in Guangxi Province, China. New information Phylogenetic analyses of a combined ITS-LSU-rpb2-tub2 dataset indicate that one of our three strains represents an undescribed species with close affinity to A. minor and the other two strains clustered amongst other isolates of A. pterospermicola. Evidence from morphology and sequence analysis indicates that GUCC 2070.7 is a new species that we introduce here as A. thunbergiae. This is the first report about taxa of Allophoma from this host plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available