4.7 Article

Virtual Level Analysis Applied to Wave Flume Experiments: The Case of Waves-Cubipod Homogeneous Low-Crested Structure Interaction

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9020230

Keywords

wave flume experiments; breaking waves; Cubipod HLCS; image-based analysis; breakwater failure; virtual level probes

Funding

  1. CONACYT-SENER-Sustentabilidad Energetica project Centro Mexicano de Innovacion en Energia del Oceano (CEMIE-Oceano) [FSE-2014-06-249795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the use of virtual level (VL) probes as an alternative image-based method to study wave interaction with coastal structures in wave flume experiments. By analyzing video recordings and processing images, the performance of coastal structures and stability of armor units can be evaluated effectively.
This paper presents the use of virtual level (VL) probes as an alternative image-based approach to investigate the interaction of waves with coastal structures in wave flume experiments. These probes are defined as regions of interest located at specific positions along the horizontal domain of the images, in which edge interfaces are detected and, thus, their vertical motions can be obtained. To demonstrate the use of the methodology, a critical condition of breaking waves interacting with a Cubipod homogeneous low-crested structure (HLCS) in a two-dimensional framework was selected. With the video recorded from the experiments, image calibration, processing, and analysis stages were implemented to analyze the performance of the HLCS in reducing wave elevations and to study the stability of the armor units. The present approach can be extended to a wide range of coastal structures applications where the interface detection between components of the scene is useful to observe the behavior of coastal structures, increasing effectiveness and alternatives to acquire precise data in 2D experimental tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available