4.6 Article

Control of deformation and annealing process to produce incoherent Σ3 boundaries in Hastelloy C-276 alloy

Journal

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2021.100944

Keywords

Hastelloy C-276; Annealing treatment; Incoherent Sigma 3 grain boundary; Grain boundary character distribution; EBSD

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50834008, 11972348, U1738108]
  2. PhD Research Foundation Project of North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering [BKY201702]
  3. Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province Science and Technology Research Project [ZD2018239]
  4. Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Protection Materials, China [SZX2020038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reasonable deformation and annealing treatment parameters lead to more incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries playing an important role in the optimization of GBE.
Hastelloy C-276 samples were cold-rolled with their thickness reduction of 7.5% and 15%, and then annealed at 1100 degrees C for 5-60 min in solid solution. The grain boundary character distributions (GBCDs) were characterized by a technique of electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD). Results indicated that, more convoluted Sigma 3 boundaries (i.e. incoherent 13 boundaries) are generated by reasonable annealing time in low strain (7.5%) sample during strain-induced boundary migration (SIBM) processing. They can induce higher Sigma 3(n) fraction and activate more interactions between special boundaries for GBE. Instead, more coherent Sigma 3 boundaries were produced by moderate strain (15%) and annealing treatment with the occurrence of static recrystallization (SRX). The recrystallized fine grains possess fewer incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries cannot promote to get more multiple twinning for optimization of GBCD. Therefore, reasonable deformation and annealing treatment parameters lead to more incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries would play an important role in the optimization of GBE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available