Journal
DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020220
Keywords
echocardiography; thoracic aorta; machine learning; normalcy; Z-score; sinuses of Valsalva
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study developed a novel Q-score tool based on OC-SVM technology for assessing the normalcy of the thoracic aorta, which demonstrated better performance compared to the traditional Z-score in patients with TA > 40mm. Furthermore, the Q-score tool helps to capture the joint distribution of relevant variables, enabling a more comprehensive consideration of the overall aortic shape.
Background: To develop a tool for assessing normalcy of the thoracic aorta (TA) by echocardiography, based on either a linear regression model (Z-score), or a machine learning technique, namely one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM) (Q-score). Methods: TA diameters were measured in 1112 prospectively enrolled healthy subjects, aging 5 to 89 years. Considering sex, age and body surface area we developed two calculators based on the traditional Z-score and the novel Q-score. The calculators were compared in 198 adults with TA > 40 mm, and in 466 patients affected by either Marfan syndrome or bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Results: Q-score attained a better Area Under the Curve (0.989; 95% CI 0.984-0.993, sensitivity = 97.5%, specificity = 95.4%) than Z-score (0.955; 95% CI 0.942-0.967, sensitivity = 81.3%, specificity = 93.3%; p < 0.0001) in patients with TA > 40 mm. The prevalence of TA dilatation in Marfan and BAV patients was higher as Z-score > 2 than as Q-score < 4% (73.4% vs. 50.09%, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: Q-score is a novel tool for assessing TA normalcy based on a model requiring less assumptions about the distribution of the relevant variables. Notably, diameters do not need to depend linearly on anthropometric measurements. Additionally, Q-score can capture the joint distribution of these variables with all four diameters simultaneously, thus accounting for the overall aortic shape. This approach results in a lower rate of predicted TA abnormalcy in patients at risk of TA aneurysm. Further prognostic studies will be necessary for assessing the relative effectiveness of Q-score versus Z-score.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available