4.7 Article

Foes or Friends: ABA and Ethylene Interaction under Abiotic Stress

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10030448

Keywords

abscisic acid; ethylene; hormone-hormone interaction; abiotic stress; plant hormones; environmental factors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plants constantly adapt to their environment by modulating various internal plant hormone signals and distributions, which collectively regulate plant growth, development, metabolism, and defense. The interplay between plant hormones coordinates a sophisticated network to achieve specific physiological functions.
Due to their sessile nature, plants constantly adapt to their environment by modulating various internal plant hormone signals and distributions, as plants perceive environmental changes. Plant hormones include abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, brassinosteroids, cytokinins, ethylene, gibberellins, jasmonates, salicylic acid, and strigolactones, which collectively regulate plant growth, development, metabolism, and defense. Moreover, plant hormone crosstalk coordinates a sophisticated plant hormone network to achieve specific physiological functions, on both a spatial and temporal level. Thus, the study of hormone-hormone interactions is a competitive field of research for deciphering the underlying regulatory mechanisms. Among plant hormones, ABA and ethylene present a fascinating case of interaction. They are commonly recognized to act antagonistically in the control of plant growth, and development, as well as under stress conditions. However, several studies on ABA and ethylene suggest that they can operate in parallel or even interact positively. Here, an overview is provided of the current knowledge on ABA and ethylene interaction, focusing on abiotic stress conditions and a simplified hypothetical model describing stomatal closure / opening, regulated by ABA and ethylene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available