4.6 Review

The Development of Arthropod Segmentation Across the Embryonic/Post-embryonic Divide - An Evolutionary Perspective

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.622482

Keywords

anamorphosis; comparative analysis; development; evolvability; fossils; hatching; gene expression; phylogeny

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article examines the post-embryonic segment addition in arthropods and emphasizes the evolution across hatching. It discusses the developmental changes underlying arthropod segmentation evolution with critical application of key concepts, showing the complexity of processes occurring across hatching.
In many arthropods, the appearance of new segments and their differentiation are not completed by the end of embryogenesis but continue, in different form and degree, well after hatching, in some cases up to the last post-embryonic molt. Focusing on the segmentation process currently described as post-embryonic segment addition (or, anamorphosis), we revise here the current knowledge and discuss it in an evolutionary framework which involves data from fossils, comparative morphology of extant taxa and gene expression. We advise that for a better understanding of the developmental changes underlying the evolution of arthropod segmentation, some key concepts should be applied in a critical way. These include the notion of the segment as a body block and the idea that hatching represents a well-defined divide, shared by all arthropods, between two contrasting developmental phases, embryonic vs. post-embryonic. This eventually reveals the complexity of the developmental processes occurring across hatching, which can evolve in different directions and with a different pace, creating the observed vagueness of the embryonic/post-embryonic divide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available