4.7 Article

Application of Faecalibacterium 16S rDNA genetic marker for accurate identification of duck faeces

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 7639-7647

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-6024-z

Keywords

Faecalibacterium; Host-specific PCR assay; Water pollution; Duck

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Supporting Program of China [2012BAJ25B06, 2012BAJ25B09]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51208533]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112015CDJZR235504]
  4. National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Projects of China [2008ZX07425-003-01]
  5. Chongqing Engineering Laboratory in Vascular Implants
  6. National '111 Plan' Base [B06023]
  7. Public Experiment Center of State Bioindustrial Base (Chongqing), China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to judge the legal duty of pollution liabilities by assessing a duck faeces-specific marker, which can exclude distractions of residual bacteria from earlier contamination accidents. With the gene sequencing technology and bioinformatics method, we completed the comparative analysis of Faecalibacterium sequences, which were associated with ducks and other animal species, and found the sequences unique to duck faeces. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and agarose gel electrophoresis techniques were used to verify the reliability of both human and duck faeces-specific primers. The duck faeces-specific primers generated an amplicon of 141 bp from 43.3 % of duck faecal samples, 0 % of control samples and 100 % of sewage wastewater samples that contained duck faeces. We present here the initial evidence of Faecalibacterium-based applicability as human faeces-specificity in China. Meanwhile, this study represents the initial report of a Faecalibacterium marker for duck faeces and suggests an independent or supplementary environmental biotechnology of microbial source tracking (MST).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available