4.6 Article

Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10020143

Keywords

hip spacer; knee spacer; antibiotic-loaded bone cement; antibiotic-impregnated bone cement; infection persistence; reinfection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection remains unknown, and there is uncertainty about the association of suboptimal impregnation with infection persistence. The study retrospectively evaluated 93 patients and found that regardless of the type of antibiotic impregnation used, reinfection or persistence of infection was observed in the majority of cases when the organism was susceptible to the locally inserted antibiotics or not tested. Further studies on the investigation of the optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement are needed.
The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection is unknown. It is also unclear, whether a suboptimal impregnation might be associated with a higher persistence of infection. A total of 93 patients (44 knee, 49 hip) were retrospectively evaluated, and the most common organism was a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, followed by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Of all the organisms, 37.1% were resistant against gentamicin and 54.2% against clindamycin. All organisms were susceptible against vancomycin. In 41 cases, gentamicin-loaded beads were inserted and in 52 cases, spacers: (2 loaded only with gentamicin, 18 with gentamicin + vancomycin, 19 with gentamicin + clindamycin, and 13 with gentamicin + vancomycin + clindamycin). The analysis of each antibiotic impregnation showed that complete susceptibility was present in 38.7% of the cases and partial susceptibility in 28%. In the remaining 33.3%, no precise statement can be made because either there was a culture-negative infection or the antibiotic(s) were not tested against the specific organism. At a mean follow-up of 27.9 months, treatment failure was observed in 6.7% of the cases. Independent of which antibiotic impregnation was used, when the organism was susceptible against the locally inserted antibiotics or not tested, reinfection or persistence of infection was observed in the great majority of cases. Future studies about the investigation of the optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement are welcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available