4.7 Article

Optimized support vector machines for unveiling mortality incidence in Tilapia fish

Journal

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 3081-3090

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.01.014

Keywords

Support vector machine; Tilapia fish protein; Moth-flame optimization; Fish mortality prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new classification approach based on swarm optimization to investigate the effects of ammonia concentration on fish protein level and bioactivity, with the aim of guiding decision-makers to review the fish's pathophysiological status. By applying the MFO-SVM method, revolutionary advances have been achieved, outperforming other machine learning approaches.
In this paper, a new classification approach based on swarm-optimization is introduced to investigate the various effects of the ammonia concentration on the protein level and bioactivity that directly affect the Egyptian Nile's fish health and mortality rate (i.e. Tilapia fish O. Niloticus). This approach enhances the Support Vector (SVM) Machines to classify the fish based on the protein level by Moth-Flame Optimization (MFO) algorithm. The experiment was divided into sub-phases: lab experiments and computational experiments. The primary purposes of the proposed approach, guiding decision-makers to review the pathophysiological status of the fish. The proposed MFO-SVM approach utilizes physical and chemical measurements to finally show revolutionary advances against the classic SVM and other well-known optimizers and classifiers. By achieving 99.983% of classification accuracy, the proposed approach outperforms other machine learning approaches on the same dataset. We believe that such an approach could be useful for many other real-world challenging tasks. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available