4.7 Review

Therapeutic Use of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: The Need for Inclusive Characterization Guidelines to Accommodate All Tissue Sources and Species

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.632717

Keywords

MSC; clinical translation challenge; metrology and characterization; commercialization; biotherapeutic development

Funding

  1. Midwest Institute for Comparative Stem Cell Biotechnology
  2. Terry Johnson Center for Basic Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The promise of MSCs as a therapeutic modality has not yet translated to consistent, successful clinical trial results in humans, despite preclinical data demonstrating their potential. MSC shareholders aim to improve the quality of life for patients with suboptimal or ineffective standard care. Although there are no FDA-approved MSC therapies in the US market, several MSC products have received regulatory approval in other countries.
Following their discovery over 50 years ago, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have become one of the most studied cellular therapeutic products by both academia and industry due to their regenerative potential and immunomodulatory properties. The promise of MSCs as a therapeutic modality has been demonstrated by preclinical data yet has not translated to consistent, successful clinical trial results in humans. Despite the disparities across the field, MSC shareholders are unified under one common goal-to use MSCs as a therapeutic modality to improve the quality of life for those suffering from a malady in which the standard of care is suboptimal or no longer effective. Currently, there is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MSC therapy on the market in the United States although several MSC products have been granted regulatory approval in other countries. In this review, we intend to identify hurdles that are impeding therapeutic progress and discuss strategies that may aid in accomplishing this universal goal of widespread therapeutic use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available