4.7 Article

Wavelet transform-based photoacoustic time-frequency spectral analysis for bone assessment

Journal

PHOTOACOUSTICS
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100259

Keywords

Photoacoustic measurement; Wavelet transform; Time-frequency spectral analysis; Bone assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12034015, 11827808, 11674249, 11704188]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0111400, 2016YFA0100800]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China [BK20190826]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2019M65156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the feasibility of using photoacoustic time-frequency spectral analysis for evaluating bone mineral density and structure. Results showed that parameters such as midband-it and slope were sensitive to BMD and could distinguish between osteoporotic and normal bones.
In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using photoacoustic time-frequency spectral analysis (PA-TFSA) for evaluating the bone mineral density (BMD) and bone structure. Simulations and ex vivo experiments on bone samples with different BMDs and mean trabecular thickness (MTT) were conducted. All photoacoustic signals were processed using the wavelet transform-based PA-TFSA. The power-weighted mean frequency (PWMF) was evaluated to obtain the main frequency component at different times. The y-intercept, midband-i t, and slope of the linearly fitted curve of the PWMF over time were also quantified. The results show that the osteoporotic bone samples with lower BMD and thinner MTT have higher frequency components and lower acoustic frequency attenuation over time, thus higher y-intercept, midband-i t, and slope. The midband-it and slope were found to be sensitive to the BMD; therefore, both parameters could be used to distinguish between osteoporotic and normal bones (p < 0.05).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available