4.3 Article

Modification of the van der Waals interaction at the Bi2Te3 and Ge(111) interface

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.024203

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. John Fell Oxford University Press (OUP) Research Fund
  2. UK National Research Facility for Advanced ElectronMicroscopy - Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK)
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) [EP/K03278X/1, EP/N032128/1]
  4. Italian Ministry of Education and Research (MIUR)
  5. Japan Public-Private Partnership Student Study Abroad Program TOBITATE Young Ambassador Program by MEXT
  6. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H05702, JP16J07422]
  7. Research Programs for Next Generation Young Scientists of Five-star Alliance [20175023]
  8. Numerical Materials Simulator at NIMS
  9. EPSRC [EP/R025770/1, EP/K03278X/1, EP/N032128/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that the weak van der Waals adhesion between Bi2Te3 and Ge can be overcome by forming an additional Te layer at their interface. First-principles calculations show that the formation of the additional Te layer is energetically favorable due to the strong hybridization between Te and Ge.
We present a structural and density-functional theory study of the interface of the quasi-twin-free grown three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Te3 on Ge(111). Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy in combination with first-principles calculations show that the weak van der Waals adhesion between the Bi2Te3 quintuple layer and Ge can be overcome by forming an additional Te layer at their interface. The first-principles calculations of the formation energy of the additional Te layer show it to be energetically favorable as a result of the strong hybridization between the Te and Ge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available