4.8 Article

Use of Nutrient Rich Hydrophytes to Create N,P-Dually Doped Porous Carbon with Robust Energy Storage Performance

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 22, Pages 12421-12428

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580553]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060190063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal strategy for the safe disposal of large amounts of hydrophyte biomass with enriched levels of N and P is challenging. In this study, we proposed and illustrated a facile pyrolysis approach to prepare an N, P-dually doped porous carbon (NPC) material with robust energy storage performance using a thermochemical self-doping process and a widely distributed hydrophyte biomass (Typha angustifolia). As a supercapacitor electrode material for electrochemical energy storage, the NPC shows a maximum capacitance of 257 F g(-1) and energy density of 19.0 Wh kg(-1) and only 3% capacitance loss after 6000 times of cyclic use, which places the NPC among the best porous carbon supercapacitors known previously. Multiple characterizations (BET, SEM, XPS, and Raman) provide evidence that NPC's excellent energy storage performance involves a pseudocapacitive contribution due to the Faradaic redox reactions of the N and P functional groupsand a capacitive contribution from the formation of the electrical double layer. The external nitrogen resource cannot improve the supercapacitor performance of NPC, suggesting a role for the assimilated nitrogen of plants. In contrast, an external phosphorus Resource can significantly increase the specific capacitance from 257 to 375 F g(-1) of NPC. These findings provide useful information for effective energy storage utilization of biomass wastes with different concentrations of N and P by fast pyrolysis and activation processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available