4.0 Article

Quantitative Proteomics Using 18O Labeling on Target Peptides and Unlabeled Standards

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 633-640

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.12247

Keywords

Mass spectrometry; Proteomics; Absolute quantification; O-18‐ water; Enzymatic labeling

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT: Ministry of Science and ICT) [2018R1A2B6008287]
  2. Changwon National University Research Fund in 2020
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B6008287] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of mass spectrometry and O-18-water labeling has led to the development of a new quantitative analysis method called QAUSIA. The experimental procedure demonstrated high accuracy and linearity, making it suitable for quantitative proteomics research.
A combination of mass spectrometry (MS) and O-18-water labeling has been applied to absolute quantitative proteomics. We introduce a new method called quantitative analysis using unlabeled standards and isotope-labeled analytes (QAUSIA). An experimental procedure with multiple-step O-18 labeling is proposed to produce such O-18-enriched peptides for investigation of labeling efficiency, response factor, and calibration curve. Furthermore, calibration curves employing unlabeled peptide as internal standard showed good linearity and similar slopes calculated from the mass spectra and the extracted ion chromatograms. Subsequently, the QAUSIA strategy was implemented on the targeted peptide of ovalbumin, and the calibration slope obtained from QAUSIA using the unlabeled synthetic peptide as a standard showed very similar results to the AQUA-based approach. In addition, the concentration of the QAUSIA strategy using the targeted peptide of ovalbumin was 5.07 +/- 0.14 nmol with respect to the theoretical expected value of 5.02 nmol, showing excellent accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available