4.7 Article

Soybean Nutrition in a Novel Single-Nutrient Source Hydroponic Solution

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11030523

Keywords

Glycine max; soybean; nutrient uptake; hydroponic; calcium; magnesium; manganese; nitrogen; phosphorus; potassium; micronutrients; nutrient deficiency

Funding

  1. Brigham Young University (BYU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional hydroponic solutions using dual nutrient salts may lead to unintended consequences, while a new hydroponic system using single-nutrient sources has been shown to be effective in adjusting individual nutrients for specific plant needs. Further research is needed to improve pH buffering and align tissue nutrient concentrations with field-grown crops.
Hydroponic systems are efficient for studying plant nutrition. It is often desirable to adjust individual nutrients for unique species' needs and/or to create multiple nutrient deficiencies within the same study. However, this is challenging to do with traditional solutions as nutrients are generally added as dual nutrient salts, such as when varying phosphorus (P) concentration also affects nitrogen concentration; potentially, the chemical form of the nutrient taken up when ammonium phosphate is the source for P. This can create unintended consequences with nutrients other than those intended for adjustment. A new hydroponic system has been created to allow for nutrient deficiencies using single-nutrient sources, including ammonium nitrate; phosphoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, and boric acids; potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and copper carbonates; manganese acetate; sodium molybdate; iron EDDHA; with HEDTA as an additional chelate. This nutrient solution was compared to a traditional Hoagland hydroponic solution to grow soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr). Additional treatments included alteration of pH in the new solution as well as evaluating varying levels of calcium, magnesium, and manganese. This new solution proved effective, as soybean was grown to maturity and performed as well as the traditional Hoagland solution. Adjusting pH downward with hydrochloric acid resulted in healthy plants, but solution pH was not adequately buffered. Adjusting pH with acetic acid resulted in toxicity. Further work is required to provide better pH buffering and approximately align tissue nutrient concentrations with field-grown soybean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available