4.8 Article

Air Quality Impact of Diffuse and Inefficient Combustion Emissions in Africa (DICE-Africa)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 19, Pages 10739-10745

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02602

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South African National Research Foundation Fellowship
  2. Schlumberger Faculty for the Future Fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [1211668]
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR Award [83542401]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1211668] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anthropogenic pollution in Africa is dominated by diffuse and inefficient combustion sources, as electricity access is low and motorcycles and outdated cars proliferate. These sources are Missing, out-of-date, or misrepresented in state-of-the-science emission. inventories: We address these deficiencies with a detailed inventory of Diffuse and Inefficient Combustion Emissions in Africa (DICE-Africa) for 2006 and 2013. Fuelwood for energy is. the largest emission source in DICE-Africa, but grows from 2006 to 2013 at a slower rate than charcoal production and use, and gasoline and diesel for motorcycles, cars, and generators. Only kerosene use and gas flaring decline. Increase in emissions from 2006 to 2013 in this work is consistent with trends in satellite observations of formaldehyde and NO2, but much slower than the explosive growth projected with a fuel consumption model. Seasonal biomass burning is considered a large pollution source in Africa, but we estimate comparable emissions of black carbon and higher emissions of nonmethane volatile organic compounds from DICE-Africa. Nitrogen oxide (NOx NO + NO2) emissions are much lower than from biomass burning. We use GEOS-Chem to estimate that the largest contribution of DICE-Africa to annual mean surface fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is >5 mu g m(-3) in populous Nigeria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available