4.3 Article

Surgical Relevance of the Suprameatal Tubercle During Superior Petrosal Vein-Sparing Trigeminal Nerve Microvascular Decompression

Journal

OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages E410-E416

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opab046

Keywords

Microvascular decompression; Trigeminal neuralgia; Trigeminal nerve; Suprameatal tubercle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enlarged suprameatal tubercle (SMT) may need to be removed during microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery in approximately 10% of cases, with the combination of SMT width and cerebellopontine cistern thickness being predictive of the need for SMT removal.
BACKGROUND: An enlarged suprameatal tubercle (SMT) can obscure visualization of the trigeminal nerve and require removal during microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery, especially when the superior petrosal vein (SPV) complex is preserved. OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence and important variables affecting the need for SMT removal with an SPV-sparing trigeminal nerve MVD. METHODS: Retrospective single-institution review identified patients who underwent a first-time, SPV-sparing MVD for trigeminal neuralgia ( TGN) over a 26-mo period. SMT length (SMT-L), SMT width (SMT-W), and peri-trigeminal cerebellopontine cisternal thickness (CT) were measured from axial high-resolution magnetic resonance images. Need for SMT removal and use of endoscopic assistance was recorded. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)/area under the curve testing. RESULTS: A total of 43 MVD surgeries for TGN on 42 patients (mean age 52.7 +/- 14.4 yr) were analyzed. Mean SMT-L, SMT-W, and CT were 9.8 +/- 1.6, 2.0 +/- 0.8, and 4.2 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively. SMT removal via drilling was required in 4/43 cases (9.3%). Endoscopic assistance was used in 3 cases (2 SMT removed and 1 SMT preserved). SMT-W was the biggest predictor of the need for SMT removal on ROC analysis (area under the curve 0.97, 0.92-1.0 95% CI). The combined thresholds of SMT-W >= 3.2 mm and CT <= 3.5 mm demonstrated 100% sensitive and 100% specificity for the need to remove the SMT on optimal cutoff analysis. CONCLUSION: SMT drilling is necessary in nearly 10% of SPV-sparing MVDs for TGN. The combination of SMT width and cerebellopontine cistern thickness is predictive of the need for SMT removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available