4.4 Article

Unilateral pulmonary hemorrhage caused by negative pressure pulmonary edema: A case report

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 1408-1415

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1408

Keywords

Airway; Anesthesia; Asthma; Hemorrhage; Pulmonary edema; Case report; Surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report describes a unilateral alveolar hemorrhage associated with NPPE in an elderly male patient with longstanding asthma who bit the endotracheal tube due to airway obstruction at the end of surgery. Anesthesiologists should be cautious not to induce airway irritation during the awakening process in asthma patients to prevent diffuse alveolar hemorrhage with NPPE.
BACKGROUND Unilateral pulmonary hemorrhage is typically reported in young and healthy men with upper respiratory tract obstruction during anesthesia in special situations. Negative pressure in the lungs is created, resulting in negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE). CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old male patient diagnosed with spinal stenosis was admitted to receive a unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression. The patient had been diagnosed with hypertension four years earlier and asthma more than 70 years earlier. We experienced a unilateral alveolar hemorrhage associated with NPPE that occurred in a longstanding asthma patient who bit the intubated endotracheal tube for a short period during posture change at the end of surgery. Because diffuse alveolar hemorrhage accompanied by NPPE was caused in this case by airway obstruction in an older patient with asthma without known risk factors, anesthesiologists should be careful not to induce airway irritation during anesthesia awakening in asthma patients. CONCLUSION Because diffuse alveolar hemorrhage accompanied by NPPE can occur, anesthesiologists should take care not to induce airway irritation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available